UK
issues new guidance on labelling of food from illegal West Bank settlements.
Stickers could read 'Israeli settlement produce' , but move
is not a boycott, says Foreign Office
Ian Black, Middle East editor, and Rory McCarthy in Jerusalem
guardian.co.uk, Thursday
10 December 2009 19.39 GMT
A Palestinian farmer
examines olives in the West Bank. The British government recommends such food
be labelled 'Palestinian produce', while that produced by Israeli settlers in
the territory be labelled 'Israeli settlement produce'. Photograph: Abbas
Momani/AFP/Getty Images Britain has acted to increase pressure on Israel
over its West Bank settlements by advising UK supermarkets on how to
distinguish between foods from the settlements and Palestinian-manufactured goods.
The government's move
falls short of a legal requirement but is bound to increase the prospects of a
consumer boycott of products from those territories. Israeli officials and
settler leaders were tonight highly critical of the decision.
Until now, food has been
simply labelled "Produce of the West Bank", but the new, voluntary guidance
issued by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra),
says labels could give more precise information, like "Israeli settlement
produce" or "Palestinian produce".
Nearly 500,000 Jewish
settlers live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, which were conquered in the
1967 war. The British government and the EU have repeatedly said Israel's
settlement project is an "obstacle to peace" in the Middle East.
EU law already requires a
distinction to be made between goods originating in Israel and those from the
occupied territories, though pro-Palestinian campaigners say this is not always
observed.
Separately, Defra said
that traders would be committing an offence if they did declare produce from
the occupied territories as "Produce of Israel".
Foods grown in Israeli
settlements include herbs sold in supermarkets, such as Waitrose,which chop,
package and label them as "West Bank" produce, making no distinction between
Israelis and Palestinians. A total of 27 Israeli firms operating in settlements
and exporting to the UK have been identified: their produce includes fruit,
vegetables, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, plastic and metal items and textiles.
Other retailers selling
their products include Tesco, Sainsbury's, Somerfield, John Lewis and B&Q.
Goods from inside Israel's
1967 borders are entitled to a preferential rate of import duty under an
agreement with the EU. Palestinian goods from the West Bank, Gaza and East
Jerusalem also enjoy duty-free or reduced-tariff treatment. Settlement products
fall outside these two categories.
"This is emphatically not
about calling for a boycott of Israel," a Foreign Office spokesman said. "We
believe that would do nothing to advance the peace process. We oppose any such
boycott of Israel. We believe consumers should be able to choose for themselves
what produce they buy. We have been very clear both in public and in private
that settlements are illegal and an obstacle to peace." The TUC general
secretary, Brendan Barber, welcomed the public clarification that marking
produce from illegal settlements on occupied territory as "produce of Israel"
was illegal, but said the government should have gone further.
Barbara Stocking, Oxfam's
chief executive, said: "We support the right of consumers to know the origin of
the products they purchase. Trade with Israeli settlements - which are illegal
under international law - contributes to their economic viability and serves to
legitimise them. It is also clear from our development work in West Bank
communities that settlements have led to the denial of rights and create
poverty for many Palestinians." Dani Dayan, the Argentinian-born leader of the
Yesha Council, which represents Israeli settlers, said the decision was the
"latest hostile step" from Britain. "Products from our communities in Judea and
Samaria should be treated as any other Israeli product," he said, using an
Israeli term for the West Bank.
Israeli officials said they
feared this was a slide towards a broader boycott of Israeli goods. Yigal
Palmor, Israel's foreign ministry spokesman, said his country's produce was
being unfairly singled out.
"It looks like it is
catering to the demands of those whose ultimate goal is the boycott of Israeli
products," he said. "The message here will very likely be used by pro-boycott
campaigners. It is a matter of concern." He said the issue of different
European customs tariffs should not extend to different labelling on supermarket
shelves. "It is a totally different thing and not required by the EU." Israel
came under intense US pressure early this year to halt construction in
settlements, but has only adopted a temporary, partial freeze. Palestinian
leaders say they will not restart peace negotiations until there is a full
settlement freeze in line with the US road map of 2003.
The Palestine Solidarity
Campaign said it welcomed the new guidance but urged Defra to go further: "The
government must seek prosecutions of companies which smuggle settlement goods
in under false labels.
"We have received many
calls from people who were distressed when they bought goods labelled 'Produce
of the West Bank' because they thought they were aiding the Palestinian
economy, then realised they were economically aiding Israel's illegal
occupation.
"Particularly following
Israel's massacre in Gaza, consumers have been shocked at Israel's war crimes
and want to take action. They do not want to feel complicit in Israel's
occupation by buying stolen goods."
'Customers will now have
honest information'
The most recent government
figures suggest only about 800,000 of food products, about three-quarters of it
olive oil (below right), was imported from occupied Palestinian territories
in the three years between 2006 and 2008.
Sainsbury's, which sells
dates and small amounts of basil and tarragon, welcomed "the greater clarity on
how to label produce from occupied territories".
"This allows us to fulfil
our commitment of providing customers with clear and honest information about
the origins of their food," the supermarket chain said."We have full
traceability back to settlement and/or grower." Waitrose also said it would be
following the guidance on the small number of West Bank lines it sold. "We
source a small selection of herbs from the West Bank area, grown on two
Israeli-managed farms, on which a Palestinian and Israeli workforce have worked
side by side for many years," said a spokesman.
"We are not motivated by
politics. Instead our policy is to ensure high standards of farming and worker
welfare on the farms from which we source. Our buyers Š have visited the two
farms in the West Bank to ensure that worker welfare meets the high standards
that we insist on. As part of our normal sourcing policy we will be carrying
out an audit on these farms in the next six months." This year the Co-op began
selling Fairtrade olive oil from the West Bank - a move hailed by Gordon Brown,
who said it meant British shoppers could help Palestinian farmers make a living.
Toby Quantrill, head of
public policy for the Fairtrade Foundation, said farmers in Palestine faced
barriers to trade which jeopardised opportunities to trade internationally on
equal terms with people making similar products. James Meikle This article originally contained comments
wrongly attributed to Barbara Stocking, Oxfam's chief executive. This has been
corrected.
guardian.co.uk Guardian
News and Media Limited 2009
========================================================
Published
on Thursday, December 10, 2009 by The Guardian/UK
UK Issues New Guidance on Labelling of Food from Illegal
Israeli Settlements
British
government calls on supermarkets to tell customers when they are buying food
from Israeli settlements in West Bank by Ian Black, Middle East editor, and Rory McCarthy in Jerusalem
The
British government has for the first time called on all supermarkets to inform
customers clearly when they are buying food produced by Israeli settlements in
the occupied West Bank.
The
new guidance on food labelling significantly increases UK pressure on Israeli
settlements, which are illegal under international law, and increases the
prospect of consumer boycotts. Israeli officials and settler leaders were
tonight highly critical of the decision.
Until
now, food has been simply labelled "Produce of the West Bank", but under the
new, voluntary guidance issued by the Department for the Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs (Defra), labels should in future give more information. It
suggested they say "Israeli settlement produce" or "Palestinian produce".
Nearly
500,000 Jewish settlers live in east Jerusalem and the West Bank. The British
government and the European Union has repeatedly said Israel's settlement
project is an "obstacle to peace" in the Middle East.
EU
law already requires a distinction to be made between goods originating in
Israel and those from the occupied territories, though pro-Palestinian
campaigners say this is not always observed.
Separately,
Defra said that traders would be committing an offence if they declared produce
from the occupied Palestinian territories as "produce of Israel".
Produce
grown in Israeli settlements include herbs sold in UK supermarkets, such as
Waitrose, which chop them up, package them and label them as "West Bank"
produce, making no distinction between Israelis and Palestinians. A total of 27
Israeli companies operating in settlements and exporting to the UK have been
identified: their produce includes fruit, vegetables, cosmetics,
pharmaceuticals, plastic and metal items and textiles. Other retailers selling
them include Tesco, Sainsbury's, Somerfield, John Lewis and B&Q.
Goods
from inside Israel's 1967 borders are entitled to a preferential rate of import
duty under an agreement with the EU. Palestinian goods from the West Bank, Gaza
and east Jerusalem also enjoy duty-free or reduced tariff treatment. Settlement
products fall outside these two categories.
"This
is emphatically not about calling for a boycott of Israel," a Foreign Office
spokesman said. "We believe that would do nothing to advance the peace process.
We oppose any such boycott of Israel. We believe consumers should be able to
choose for themselves what produce they buy. We have been very clear both in
public and in private that settlements are illegal and an obstacle to peace."
The Trades Union Congress general secretary, Brendan Barber, welcomed the
public clarification that marking produce from illegal settlements on occupied
territory as "produce of Israel" was against the law, but said the government
should have gone further.
"Profiting
from the goods produced in the illegal settlements is contrary to international
law and they should be banned from sale in the European Union, as they are in
Palestine. Trade in such goods undermines the viability of a sovereign
Palestinian state and holds back the peace process."Barbara Stocking, Oxfam's
chief executive, said: "We support the right of consumers to know the origin of
the products they purchase. Trade with Israeli settlements - which are illegal under
international law - contributes to their economic viability and serves to
legitimise them. It is also clear from our development work in West Bank
communities that settlements have led to the denial of rights and create
poverty for many Palestinians." Dani Dayan, the Argentinian-born leader of the
Yesha Council, which represents Israeli settlers, said the decision was the
"latest hostile step" from Britain. "Products from our communities in Judea and
Samaria should be treated as any other Israeli product," he said, using an
Israeli term for the West Bank.
Israeli
officials said they feared this was a slide towards a broader boycott of
Israeli goods. Yigal Palmor, Israel's foreign ministry spokesman, said his
country's produce was being unfairly singled out.
"It
looks like it is catering to the demands of those whose ultimate goal is the
boycott of Israeli products," he said. "The message here will very likely be
used by pro-boycott campaigners. It is a matter of concern." He said the issue
of different European customs tariffs should not extend to different labelling
on supermarket shelves. "It is a totally different thing and not required by
the EU." Israel came under intense US pressure early this year to halt
construction in settlements, but has only adopted a temporary, partial freeze.
Palestinian leaders say they will not restart peace negotiations until there is
a full settlement freeze in line with the US road map of 2003.
The
Palestine Solidarity Campaign said it welcomed the new guidance but urged Defra
to go further: "The government must seek prosecutions of companies which
smuggle settlement goods in under false labels. We have received many calls
from people who were distressed when they bought goods labelled "Produce of the
West Bank" because they thought they were aiding the Palestinian economy, then
realised they were economically aiding Israel's illegal occupation.
"Particularly
following Israel's massacre in Gaza, consumers have been shocked at Israel's
war crimes and want to take action. They do not want to feel complicit in
Israel's occupation by buying stolen goods." 2009 Guardian News and Media
Limited
Article
printed from www.CommonDreams.org
URL
to article: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/12/10-8
========================================================
From Times Online
December 11, 2009
Fury
at UK move to label settlement produce as Israel talks of 'concern'
Alex Ralph
Britain was today embroiled
in an international row after Israel accused the Government of encouraging a
boycott of foods from its settlements in the West Bank.
The Department for the
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has issued voluntary guidance to UK
supermarkets stating labels should differentiate between "Israeli settlement
produce" and "Palestinian produce". Foods are currently labelled "Produce of
the West Bank".
Israeli officials fear
Britain's move signals a shift towards a wider boycott of Israeli goods.
Yigal Palmor, Israel's
foreign ministry spokesman, said it was a "matter of concern" that pro-boycott
campaigners would seize upon the guidance.
"It looks like it is
catering to the demands of those whose ultimate goal is the boycott of Israeli
products," he said.
"The message here will very
likely be used by pro-boycott campaigners. It is a matter of concern." The
Foreign Office today said that it "opposed any such boycott of Israel".
"This is emphatically not
about calling for a boycott of Israel," a Foreign Office spokesman said. "We
believe that would do nothing to advance the peace process." But the spokesman
added: "We believe consumers should be able to choose for themselves what
produce they buy. We have been very clear both in public and in private that
settlements are illegal and an obstacle to peace." Representatives of Israeli
settlers attacked the move as the "latest hostile step" from Britain.
"Products from our
communities in Judea and Samaria should be treated as any other Israeli
product," said Dani Dayan, leader of the Yesha Council.
Defra says traders are
committing an offence if they declare produce from the occupied territories in
the West Bank as "Produce of Israel".
EU law stipulates that
labels distinguish between goods originating in Israel and those from their
occupied territories.
British retailers selling
their products include Tesco, Sainsbury's, Somerfield, John Lewis and B&Q.
The Guardian reported that it had identified 27 Israeli firms
that operate in the settlements and export produce, such as plastics, metal,
fruit and vegetables to Britain.
There are close to 500,000
Jewish settlers living in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, which were occupied
in the 1967 war.
A European Union agreement
entitles goods from within these borders to a preferential rate of import duty.
Palestinian goods also enjoy similar treatment. However, products from the
settlements are not included.
Barbara Stocking, Oxfam's
chief executive said: "Profiting from the goods produced in the illegal
settlements is contrary to international law and should be banned from sale in
the European Union., as they are in Palestine.
"We support the right of
consumers to know the origin of the products they purchase." Mr Palmor said the
issue of different European customs tariffs should not cover different
labelling. "It is a totally different thing and not required by the EU," he
said.
This year, Israel introduced
a temporary freeze on the construction of new settlements in parts of the West
Bank following pressure from the US Government.
======================================
BBC News:
Food labels advice
change over Palestinian territories
New labelling for West
Bank foods
UK food labels are set
to distinguish between goods from Palestinians in the occupied territories and
produce from Israeli settlements.
Food packaging guidelines
advise a change from labels usually naming only Israel or West Bank as the
source.
The government said it was
opposed to a boycott of Israeli goods, but that the settlements posed an
obstacle to peace.
The Palestinian general
delegation to the UK welcomed the move, but Israel said it was "extremely
disappointed".
All Jewish settlements in
the West Bank are illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this.
The new guidelines
recommend that food labels in supermarkets should bear the phrases "Israeli
settlement produce" or "Palestinian produce".
Manuel Hassassian,
Palestinian general Delegate to the UK, said: "We welcome this. We have been
calling for this for two years, since we began lobbying major British
supermarkets when we discovered that they were routinely selling products
marked 'produce of the West Bank' which were in fact the produce of illegal
settlements.
"This is a very positive
response by the British government."
But the Israeli embassy
said it was "extremely disappointed".
"We think this is singling
out Israel and it plays into the hands of those who are calling for a boycott
of Israeli goods," it said.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/8407289.stm
Published: 2009/12/11
00:28:01 GMT
BBC MMIX
PHOTO CAPTION: UK
unions have voted to boycott Israeli settlement goods